Microsoft sql server sp_addmessage

As such, most instance-level features are not supported in SQL Database. T-SQL statements and options aren't available if they configure instance-level options, operating system components, or specify file system configuration. When such capabilities are required, an appropriate alternative is often available in some other way from SQL Database or from another Azure feature or service.

This page supplements that article, and focuses on T-SQL statements. The core DDL statements are available, but DDL statement extensions related to unsupported features, such as file placement on disk, are not supported.

In addition to T-SQL statements related to the unsupported features described in Azure SQL Database feature comparison , the following statements and groups of statements aren't supported. As such, if your database to be migrated is using any of the following features, re-engineer your application to eliminate these T-SQL features and statements.

For example, availability groups were introduced in SQL Server Unless all is specified for language , all localized versions of a message must be dropped before the U. English version of the message can be dropped. The following example drops a user-defined message, number , from sys. The following example drops a user-defined message, number , that includes a localized version of the message.

The following example drops a localized version of a user-defined message, number , without dropping the whole message. Skip to main content. Search related threads. Remove From My Forums. Answered by:. Archived Forums. Sign in to vote. Hi, I have problems with the concept of user-defined messages. I'm migrating from sybase ase to sql and found out that there is only one global pool of messages. Do you give every project on this server a dedicated range of error-numbers?

In my environment the developers own their databases and used to be able to create their own messages. Isn't it strange? Tuesday, June 6, PM.

In order to create a module SP that allows to temporary escalate a low privileged user context to execute the server-scoped call we typically have 2 options: Use EXECUTE AS using a context that will have enough permissions and allow this context to be trusted at server scope. Friday, June 9, PM. There are two ways to re-create the same signed module in a different database sharing the same certificate in such a way that they behave the same way : 1 If you have absolute control over the server and trust the privileged users on the new database, the easiest solution is to backup the certificate public certificate and private key , recreate the certificate on the target database again both public and private , recreate the module on the new database and sign the new module.

Wednesday, June 21, PM. Hi Manuel, You might be seeing a symptom of not having the right to impersonate. Friday, June 9, AM. Hi Raul, your post was very helpful. It's exaclty what I needed!